This case -that was overlooked by many of us- can and should have profound implications for our justice system. Only a few of the questions that quickly come to mind are:
- What's the role of the courts when regular citizens take decisions that were previously relegated to the courts?
- What's the value of police investigations if they cannot find the people guilty of crimes but a "common internet jury" can?
- When should this public jury/investigation panel be called into action?
- How can anybody stop it from springing into action by itself and publishing online private individual's details?
- What if the information collected by this "public commitee" is wrong and the innocent are accused?
- How and when would the publicly accused know that their information is being posted online, and wht they're being accused of?
- When will the first death penalty be applied to a regular citizen by strangers on the streets and how could this be avoided?
Subscribe to my RSS feed or learn more at Trendirama.com.
