Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

How to improve search engine results?

(my comment on Frank Schilling's post)
Instead of a search box, we could have a page that although is still simple, has more than one search box, or appearing search boxes to narrow down your search.
Each search box goes in turn narrowing the range, helping you to see clearly what you really want.
This is so simple yet none of the big ones are doing it, except in their hidden "avanced search tab"
If search engines would really want to improve search, that's one thing that they could do.
As an ex Real Estate professional, I can tell you this is something we've always done in our business inside our own webpages.

Example of search engine screen and user input:

Search one:

search what?
user- "real estate"
where? >
Santa Barbara, CA
any particular type of property?>
(drop down: condo, house, etc)

Search two:
Search what?>
user- "buy second hand car new york"
any particular maker?>
(drop down: ford, mercedes, etc)

During the whole process, the user could press ANYTIME the "search button" when he is satisfied with the range of the search.
((There were some programming limitations before on doing this fast enough for the search engine to set the next question, but those limitations are quickly dissapearing and text can already be parsed out as it is being typed. I am sure Google could make it))
Also, as the user narrows down using the boxes, the ads next to them also change accordingly, so the user can click on them anytime even before pressing the search button. The advertiser gets a visit, the s. engine gets advertising money, the user goes where he wants, domainers can still sell a good domain name...all happy. (I am not so optimitic about the future of parking as it is conceived today though)

If search engines would really want to make it happen, they could have done so already, particularly Google.
I think that they have't because Google benefits from the kind of messy search query we do today, since adwords bidders will pay ridiculous money based solely on the hope that the user will find their -nearly invisible- ad compelling enough to click on it. The big losers of today are delusional adwords advertisers.
However, as Sahar said, there are still chances for smaller players to try to defeat Google. In any case, they wouldn't defeat it, they would just be bought by it in a few months.

Regards


Subscribe to my RSS feed or learn more at Trendirama.com.

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

16 Lies about Web 2.0 you shouldn’t believe

Ok. So you are at home, you have no money. You have read all the existing “Y and X created this website in a garage and got reach beyond their wildest dreams” and you think “wow, this web 2.0 is the next big thing! This is my chance to make it big!”

Well…I am afraid it is time to bring you back to earth... and this will help you.
Here is my list of lies about web 2.0 we are supposed to believe, but shouldn’t:

  1. People like to share

No. People like to acquire. They like to acquire possessions, knowledge, friends, love…and everything else. People only care for themselves. Even when they’re sharing, as any good Buddhist book would tell you, most people are doing it for the good feelings that this sharing gives to them. Repeat after me: people are selfish. We only care for what we want, and how we feel. Nobody cares about you, your projects or website. If you are able to align people’s interest with your project, people may share something with you or others. If not, forget it. Re-read this paragraph. It is the most important one of the whole post.

  1. You can do it in a few months

Again. If you don’t have the money, it may take you years. If you have the money, it may take you days. Everything is possible. Do you have the cash to compete?

  1. You’ll get venture capital, they’ll fund it, and you’ll all get rich with your great idea!

In my view, seeking venture capital is akin to selling your soul to the devil, most times without getting to sleep with Angelina first (believe me, I tried). Venture capitalists are there to make money, as vultures are here to eat corpses. VCs are usually very smart people. Many smarter than you. Do you really think that they’ll give you a chance if they can get away with the whole cake? Are you prepared to read and understand a complicated partnership contract? Do you have the money to pay a good lawyer to analyze it for you before you sign? (they do) Are you sure you are ready to fly with the vultures? If not, stay away from them.

Some people are like a vacuum cleaner. You talk to them and you are already losing money. Stay away from that kind of people. Don’t try to run before you walk. (But don’t worry too much about them, VCs will only talk to you for 2 secs when you have already shown the viability of your project at least with a) profits or b) a community in the thousands of members)

  1. Building a community is easy

Oh, man, what the hell have you been reading? Building a community is incredibly difficult in most circumstances. It requires skill in marketing, psychology, logistics, and a sense of empathy that borders the telepathic powers. It also requires patience.

Unless you can bribe people to be part of your project ($$$) or you are Google and you can almost force them to do it because you’ve surrounded them in a circle of services they can’t live without, (if you are reading this post, you are a few billions short of doing that probably) you don’t have a chance.

Besides, have you tried to create a professional website, send a newsletter, set up and populate a forum with entries, network with community members on Skype to encourage them to share and communicate, set up a parallel blog for your project, populate it with posts, send a few hundred emails around, submit your posts to social bookmarking websites, write articles to promote your project, eat and sleep…have you? Because if you haven’t, you should know that just that is what lies ahead for you. You can wave goodbye to your social life. Do you still think that building a community is easy?

  1. You can build a community quickly

No. It depends how well you do it, and how much money you have to create buzz around the web. Without that, you are and will be nothing. Even if you are very lucky and have some friends at Digg or Reddit, your traffic won’t stick, unless there is something incredibly valuable for them, perfectly presented, that they can’t get somewhere else and is incredibly easy for them to get.

  1. Anyone can do it

Not true. To make all this work you need Business, Psychology and Technology skills, to start with. You also need real life experience dealing with people, so you can detect when they’re lying to you (this will save you time and disappointments). You need a strong will. You need focus. You need to be decisive. You need to be a risk-taker. Are you still up for it? Do you have all that?

  1. In design, simplicity is always better

No. The need for simplicity in design is proportional to the intellectual capacity of your community members/target market.

Certainly simple layouts look quite nice. But if you have plenty of information to show, and your target market appreciates quick access to that information, you are better off showing as much as you can of it right away, to ensure that they click on something and stay in your website. Everything is relative. (By the way: never believe lists or articles from people that seem to know better (like this one). Rules are not set in stone. Be sceptical about everything. Test everything by yourself)

  1. Everyone is motivated by money. If I offer enough money, people will come.

No. Everyone is motivated by different things. Even if you offer a lot of money, most educated people using the internet don’t need your money. Unless you can offer them something else that is of value to them, they won’t come to your website/community. The problem is that you won’t know what is important to them, and most of the time they won’t tell you (don’t we all hate polls?). There’s where your telepathic powers will come handy.

  1. You have to use Flash, childish looking icons and graphics to make it look 2.0

Again. It depends of your target market. If you use childish looking icons, a big chunk of your market may be put off. Maybe you live in a world of MFC websites (“made for children”) but not all of us live or like to interact with that kind of designs. If you use animations where they’re not needed, you’ll put people off. You may like cartoon aesthetics. Not everyone else may.

  1. You can be the next Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia), Larry Page (Google) or one of the youtTube founders (what were their names?)

Jimmy Wales is a smart man that has tried lots of different things in his life. Some have work. Many others have not. What he has done is not easy. You just don’t know about his failures. It doesn’t mean he didn’t have them. Remember that.

Larry page and company had a background that allowed them to create something people sorely needed, at the right time in the right place. I heard in the grapevine that the trend-setting simplicity of Google’s design was due to the lack of knowledge of HTML by its founders. In any case, Google’s founders were able to surround themselves with the right people to get to where they are, that mean they’re either incredibly smart, or incredibly lucky (I would guess the first one)
Yes, you can do it. But never think it’ll be easy. And remember that for every Wales and every Page that make it, there are +5.000.000.000 people who didn’t make it. My advice: be realistic, start small, choose your niche carefully, build from the ground up and work smart, not only hard.

  1. It is an open field, everyone is welcome

No. There is an invisible elite on the internet you should know about. There are two kinds of huge readership websites that you would like to get linked from, in order to get traffic for you new project.

One: newspapers and other established media companies with a strong presence online. (e.g. The Guardian, CNN) They won’t link to you easily.

Two: top bloggers. They won’t link to you easily either, unless your cash talks to them first. As in anything else in life, their ego has been multiplied for a factor of 1000 for every 10 visitors to their blog that they have gotten. Don’t believe me? Try it! (exception Seth Godin and Guy Kawasaki. They responded to my emails. They turned me down, but they –or someone on their behalf- responded)

  1. Corporations are not interested in your niche, so they’ll give you time to grow.

Corporations are interested in taking everything they can get. If you are still having a chance, it just means that your market is so tiny that they haven’t paid attention to it. YET. But they will at some point. In that moment, you may have worked X years in your project, and suddenly, when you are already running out of steam and illusion in the whole thing, some giant multinational comes with a stupid name and a few millions in advertising budget and blows you out of the market in a second.

You may have a first mover advantage. So what? That doesn’t mean what it used to. Get a good backup plan. Don’t leave your job just yet...

  1. People will be loyal to your community

No. People are not loyal to anything. In all spheres of life, people are only loyal to their self interest, and thus will leave you in the blink of an eye if and when a better offer comes along. No doubt about it.

  1. You won’t make any enemies! It is about people! In web 2.0 we are all friends!

So you think “If I go after a niche that nobody is paying attention to, I offer something unique, I shouldn’t bother anyone” Wrong. Some people want your market, even if they have not paid attention to it before. Some other people are plain losers, and like to undermine other’s efforts for no reason (like a bastard who reported me for spam and cost me my hosting and email address). You’ll have at least those two enemies as soon as you put something up on the internet. If you are making it right, you’ll have enemies. And the better you do it, the more you’ll have.

Neither in web 1.0, nor in 2.0 or 54.0 people will let you succeed without paying a price, if they can help it. We are always competing. We all want to be the best and only. And some play way too dirty. It is people’s nature. Watch your back.

  1. You’ll be bought by Google

Dream ooon! I know you heard the American Dream speech too. I know you’ve seen on TV the people who won the lottery as well. Well, I have news for you: Google and the other big potential purchasers have better things to do than buying your website, unless you have achieved critical mass (by the time of youTube’s acquisition, it is said that the site had hundreds of thousands of visits) This is not a lie in itself, as it is a myth. For every company that Google buys, 92837943 were not bought, and many disappeared never to be heard of again. Remember that when you are landing from your rosy cloud. The American dream is a lie. And Santa Claus and the fairies don’t exist. Sorry. Eventually someone would have had to tell you anyway.

  1. You can do most of this with free tools

Hahahhahha. You must be joking. Most free tools are crap, most of the time. They’re usually limited in the time you can use them for, or in their functionality, unless you buy the “premium” version. ($$$).Getting those tools for free is illegal. Hosting is not free. Domain registration is not free. Your time is not free. Have you ever heard of opportunity cost? It is the value of the time spent in something, compared with the returns of the investment of that time doing something else. If you didn’t understand very well this previous phrase, don’t worry about it, your opportunity cost is very low.

Hey. Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that you can’t do it. After all, I am still trying to do it. And I believe I will.

I am just saying that you have to be realistic, and that a post like this can save you endless hours of frustration, hard work, broken dreams, and the occasional stab in the back…on your way to the top. As the founder of Trendirama.com, I have been also invited to believe these lies, and learnt from experience. Appreciate these words. They’re golden knives. They hurt you, but they’re golden nonetheless. Good luck!! (hey leave your comment if I forgot anything and I'll do a better post)


Subscribe to my RSS feed or have your say about The Future at TRENDIRAMA.COM

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Are .com's such a great investment?

My response to the author of this article
""There are things I saw in the comments to that article that didn't make much sense. One domainer said that your theory about "all it takes is browsers placing a search box in the navigation bar" is impossible and will never happen. This is typical, and I see that in my domainer friends as well. For the information of your commenters, what you say is already hapenning in Firefox since a long time ago now, and it stays like that update after update (which means that people don't' mind, or that even if it is so, Google or anyone has the power to force the browser into it without the browser losing significant market share). Another point I see they're wrong, is that they act as if the .com extension is untouchable, or they play in a finite market. For me it is not so, for example when a UK company buys a .co.uk, the .com extension loses a potential buyer. And many people will follow.
Domainers believe that prices will always go up because people will pay anything for their domains. I don't see this happening. If a small business can't have the .com, it won't stop doing business, it will just buy the extension they can afford. Would it have been better the .com? most probably. Is it essential to survive or do business, thus pushing prices of .com's to the stratosphere? No. Or not for much longer.
Another thing domains don't want to see, is that as there are .co.uk and other extensions that didn't exist before, I don't see why new extensions couldn't be brought in in the future, thus eroding even more tha value of .com.
Another reason is that countries usually push more or less openly their own extension. I lived in Spain, and the "de facto" there is ".es" The .com is the weird one. Users don't care who has the .com, because they would never visit it or type it in the first place.
In China the government wants to "force" into the population the .cn extension, I heard, and domains in their own language.
In india, they want to do the same about their own language.

So maybe I am very wrong, but I cannot see such high value as domainers are trying to make us believe in .com's (just in case, I own a few domains myself, you never know ;) I don't think what they say is not true, what I just think is that it is being exaggerated 1000 times, there definitely is a bubble about the .com extension, and that the basic assumptions of domainers about .com and the future is flawed. As an apprentice Futurist, my job is to see the big picture, and many of these guys seem to be too emotionally involved in the matter as to see the big picture anymore...

Subscribe to my RSS feed or learn more at Trendirama.com

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Make money online with John Chow

The man of the left is one of the most famous bloggers today. John Chow is a highly creative and money driven person whose blog can give you a ton of information on how to make money online. There is so much info there...you would need already two lives to investigate it all properly and take action. That would surely make me rich...in my next life.
He also invented the "review this blog" system, which is more or less what I am doing here. He says that if you review his blog with a certain text in your blog post, he'll link back to you. And this is a good opportunity for any blogger to get a lot of traffic. I don't know if this is true, but here you have an idea (which I am sure he had already: make a similar system for community projects and link to Trendirama from there! ;) now I am the evil one)
Basically, what you have to do is to add this text to a review of this blog (like this post)
John Chow dot Com is blog that helps you make money online. If you do a review of his blog, he’ll link to it and send you a ton of traffic.
(It it is true what he says, then you would get a link back from him. I'll let you know if he did or didn't link to this post)

So, let's analyze his blog briefly...

These are only a few of the many things to notice, that he does well:
- he personalizes his favicon with his face. Very good idea. You may like his face or not, but doing that way and in high contrast, it definitely draws your attention to wherever you see it. Probably the smartest favicon I've ever seen.
- he seems to talk with honesty from the beginning about his intention of monetizing his blog.
- he is very creative in the ways of doing it
- he shares his best results and ideas with the community through his posts. Since he posts mainly his successes, we don't have to go through the stumbling that he may have had to go through to find the best way of doing things.
- he knows how to grow. He included invited authors to keep his blog fresh and interesting and possibly to prevent his own burn out. Smart move again.
- he has been able to create a community around his personal project, and that's no easy feat, even if you do it on the most attractive subject for many people "make money online". He has a lot of competition but seems to be the number one.
- he seems to have invented the "review this blog and get a link" system. That's not only smart, but a a good way to spread knowledge and wealth around. (In that respect, he is identical to the Trendirama.com project. Kudos for that)
- he has been criticized left and right but he doesn't seem to care
- he is very clever, and you can see that in his posts. I have the feeling that he is very hard working too.
- there is a lot more work behind his blog that you would think. He is a master in what he does, and that's one of the typical signs of mastery: he makes it seem simple.
- his priority is working smart, not working hard. I agree 100% with that philosophy!
- he has made some powerful connections, and due the the "snow ball effect", he gets better connections every day. In one way or another, those opportunities sooner or later will "overflow" to his followers. Smart pioneers are the best people to watch and be associated with.

Things that I don't like so much on his blog:
- his blog can be sometimes excessively commercial (however this is normal, bearing in mind his publicly delcared goal: to make as much money as possible through it)
- some of his commenters seem not to have anything to say, really. They seem to be there only to try to promote themselves. Unlike John, they don't show it openly, but rather praising John in most things he does / say, being he right or not. Unlike John, they don't usually provide you with a lot of interesting information
- some of said commenters seem to admire the guy...too much. They seem to have lost their sense of objectivity, or they never had it in the first place
- reviews and pictures of food are boring for me, and remind me of Xiaxue's blog
- John wants us to enroll in Agloco. I don't have enough information about it, but I instinctively will stay away most times from anything similar to multilevel marketing. (however I am not saying these systems cannot work.)
- there are always two cars in the banner at the top of his blog. And too much wasted space. Some people like cars, some don't. Some like the colour blue, some don't. If you want to monetize 100%, you want to attract and please as much people as you can. I would put some randonm images there, or a multi-coloured neutral collage (politically correct) a pretty flash presentation or something...
- he has made public his pictures, the city where he lives, and where he usually eats. (and I haven't read more than 20 posts so far!) For me, making public this information, coupled with letting the public know that he is so financially successful, is a big mistake. There are certain people in the world that shouldn't know where to find you, if you are so successful. I hope he knows what he is doing in this respect, and has taken appropriate protection for him and his family. His ego has been a bad advisor on this matter. There are too many idiots around with too much time in their hands...
It is too late for John now, but, for all of you out there...watch out! If what you say is really interesting, if you know your stuff, readers will come. There is no need to make it personal. Yes, it is a nice touch, but thre is no need to do it.

Overall, yes, it is a blog I would recommend you to read if you are interested in making money online in any way. It is one of the few I follow on RSS. You can always learn something there, or get pointers that help you monetize your online activities.

(PS- I'll do the same as John and many of his followers: if you link to this blog with the word "blog of Javier Marti", I'll link back and review your blog. Just drop me a line with a link to the post)

Liked this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed or learn more interesting stuff, at Trendirama.com. You can also write there!

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Web 2.0 explained in a few words

By "The Sage":

Web 2.0 is about social collaboration (blogs, vlogs, wikis, user generated content [ugc]) using Ajax and Ruby on Rails and a nice looking logo with a name that is either missing some vowels or adding extra ones in (translation - no money to buy the properly spelled domain name and all the good domain names are gone). The business model is to get enough interest in it for a few months to get some VC backing to then go and use that VC money to purchase enough traffic from Google over the year and hopefully sell to Google, Google, or Google. Maybe Yahoo if Google passes.

The founders get 5% of their company, the VCs at the various stages get 95% and Google gets a lot more eyeballs to monetize of their adsense product. Those who get these eyeballs are more Web 2.0 companies that just received some VC funding and these VC funds are flush with cash because every 2 in 10 companies they fund ($50,000 to $5M with the average being $350,000) get sold for $20 to $50 million to Google or a profitable business.

Liked this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed or learn more interesting stuff, at Trendirama.com. You can also write there!

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Top web tools for college students

I supppose not many of the (ehm) thousands of readers of this blog are college students, but in case you are, this article may be interesting for you


Want to learn interesting stuff? Visit Trendirama.com!